A newsletter for modern marketers.
TRUSTED BY THE WORLD'S SMARTEST MARKETERS
Free ad performance benchmarks every week.
Live webinars and strategy sessions with industry leaders.
Watch all previous episodes on our YouTube channel.
Insider strategies from the smartest brands in ecommerce.
SEE LATEST POSTS:
The PESO Model: Integrating Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned Media
Audiences no longer meet brands in a single place.Â
One moment, it’s a quick scroll past a sponsored Instagram post. The next, it’s reading a media mention in an industry outlet, or opening a company’s newsletter.Â
These interactions are fragmented, fleeting, and scattered across countless channels.
The PESO model unites Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned media to help marketers turn disconnected touchpoints into cohesive, strategic campaigns.Â
Instead of treating each channel as a silo, PESO shows how they can reinforce and amplify one another for greater impact.
In this article, we’ll break down what the PESO model is, explore each of its four components, and show why integration matters. We’ll also outline a practical implementation framework, map key KPIs, highlight common pitfalls, and offer best practices to ensure success.Â
Whether you’re just starting with PESO or looking to refine your approach, you’ll leave with a clear roadmap for putting the model into action.
What Is the PESO Model & Its OriginÂ
The PESO model is a communications framework that brings together four types of media: Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned.Â
Instead of treating each channel as an isolated tactic, PESO helps marketers design campaigns where these elements reinforce one another.
The concept was popularized in 2014 by Gini Dietrich, founder of the communications blog Spin Sucks.Â
Dietrich introduced PESO as a way to move beyond the old silos of “advertising versus PR” and reflect the reality of the modern digital landscape, where lines between channels blur.Â
For example, a blog post (Owned) might be promoted with ads (Paid), spark conversation on social media (Shared), and eventually be cited in a news story (Earned).
In today’s fragmented environment, where audiences discover brands through a mix of feeds, mentions, and direct brand touchpoints, the PESO model provides a structured approach.Â
It gives organizations a common language for planning integrated strategies, while also offering a practical map for how to amplify reach, credibility, and impact across platforms.
The Four Components Explained
The PESO model is built on four distinct but complementary types of media. Each plays a unique role in shaping how audiences discover, engage with, and trust your brand.Â
Understanding the strengths and limitations of each component is the first step toward designing an integrated campaign.
Paid Media
Paid media includes advertising and sponsored placements; anything your brand pays to distribute. Think search ads, social ads, display banners, or sponsored posts.Â
The main advantage is precision: you can target audiences by demographics, interests, or behaviors and scale visibility quickly.
Pros: Highly targeted, scalable, delivers fast results.
Cons: Costly over time, subject to ad fatigue, and easily tuned out if the creative doesn’t resonate.
Earned Media
Earned media is coverage you don’t pay for, such as press mentions, influencer shout-outs, or third-party endorsements.Â
It builds credibility because the message comes from someone other than the brand.
Pros: Carries strong trust and authority, often more persuasive than advertising.
Cons: Hard to control, unpredictable in timing, and inconsistent in volume.
Shared Media
Shared media refers to the engagement that happens on social platforms: likes, shares, comments, and user-generated content.Â
It thrives on authenticity and the ability to reach new audiences through organic amplification.
Pros: Authentic, community-driven, often viral in nature.
Cons: Algorithm dependence, reputational risk if negative sentiment spreads, and limited control over reach.
Owned Media
Owned media covers the channels your brand controls, like your website, blog, email newsletter, or resource library.Â
It’s the foundation of your narrative and provides long-term value.
Pros: Full control over messaging and format, evergreen potential, valuable for SEO.
Cons: Requires consistent resourcing and effort, slower to scale without amplification.
Together, these four components form the building blocks of an integrated media framework to help you reap PESO model benefits. When orchestrated intentionally, they create a cycle where each type amplifies the others.
PESO Model Integration Strategy
Each component of PESO has value on its own, but the real power comes from weaving them together.Â
‍
When Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned media operate in sync, they generate a compounding effect that no single channel can achieve.
For example:
- You publish a white paper on your website (Owned)
- It is then shared on social channels (Shared)
- It sparks discussion online and catches the attention of journalists or bloggers (Earned)
- That coverage can then be promoted with paid campaigns to reach an even wider audience (Paid)
Each step reinforces the others, creating a loop of visibility, credibility, and engagement.
This integrated approach is more than just “nice to have.” In a landscape where audiences encounter brands in fragmented, unpredictable ways, orchestration ensures consistent messaging and maximizes ROI and PESO model benefits.Â
Instead of chasing results from isolated tactics, you build a connected system where every piece of content contributes to a larger media strategy.
Ultimately, PESO integration turns scattered touchpoints into a unified experience, amplifying reach, deepening trust, and delivering results greater than the sum of their parts.
How to Implement the PESO Model
Understanding the PESO model is one thing; putting it into practice is another.Â
The most effective way to execute an integrated campaign is to approach it as a phased strategy, starting with what you already have and layering on support from each media type.
1. Audit Your Assets
Begin by reviewing what you already own across PESO categories.Â
Do you have a strong blog library? A social presence with active engagement? Recent press coverage or ad campaigns?Â
This inventory highlights strengths to build on and gaps to address.
2. Select a Campaign Hub
Choose a high-impact owned asset to serve as the centerpiece of your campaign.Â
This could be a research report, a webinar, or a long-form blog post; something substantial enough to anchor the rest of your efforts.
3. Build the PESO Cascade
Once you have your hub, plan how to extend it across channels:
- Shared: Post highlights, snippets, or graphics on social media to drive organic discussion.
- Earned: Pitch the asset to media outlets, bloggers, or industry partners for coverage and third-party validation.
- Paid: Amplify the best-performing content through targeted ads to reach new audiences and reinforce awareness.
4. Coordinate Across Teams
Messaging, timing, and creative elements should be consistent across all channels.Â
Align content calendars, synchronize agency or team contributions, and make sure every touchpoint reinforces the same narrative.
5. Launch, Monitor, and Iterate
Roll out the campaign and track performance in real time. Use early results to optimize distribution, adjust creative, or rebalance your paid budget.Â
Treat PESO in modern marketing as an ongoing cycle: each campaign should inform and improve the next.
When executed with intention, this framework transforms a single asset into a multi-channel engine, maximizing reach and ROI through integrated orchestration.
Measurement & KPI MappingÂ
An integrated PESO media strategy is only as strong as its ability to prove results.Â
Each media type comes with its own performance indicators, and tracking them consistently is key to understanding impact.
Paid Media Metrics
- Impressions and reach
- Click-through rate (CTR)
- Cost per acquisition (CPA) or return on investment (ROI)
Earned Media Metrics
- Volume of media mentions
- Quality of coverage (tier-one vs. niche outlets)
- Referral traffic and backlinks
Shared Media Metrics
- Number of shares or reposts
- Engagement rate (likes, comments, retweets, saves)
- Sentiment and community growth
Owned Media Metrics
- Page views and unique visitors
- Time on page or bounce rate
- Lead generation and conversions
While these metrics provide useful channel-specific insights, the real value of PESO lies in integrated measurement.Â
For example:
- Traffic from earned or shared placements boosting conversions on owned assets.
- Cross-channel conversions where a customer first sees an ad, then engages with social, before converting on the website.
- Aggregated PESO ROI that reflects the interplay of channels rather than isolated performance.
‍
A unified dashboard that pulls in metrics from advertising platforms, web analytics, PR coverage, and social monitoring makes these connections visible.Â
It shifts measurement from siloed reporting to holistic insights, helping teams optimize campaigns and demonstrate how PESO integration drives business outcomes.
Common Pitfalls & Best Practices
Even with a solid framework, many organizations stumble when rolling out PESO campaigns.Â
Here are four common challenges, and the best practices that prevent them.
Siloed Execution -> Synchronized Planning Calendar
Teams often manage Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned channels independently, which leads to missed opportunities for amplification.
Instead, use a synchronized planning calendar that includes all channels. This ensures campaigns launch in concert and every channel supports the same initiative.
Inconsistent Messaging -> Consistent Brand
Without alignment, the same campaign may be communicated differently across platforms, weakening impact and confusing audiences.
Instead, establish a consistent brand voice and messaging framework. Provide guidelines and shared content assets so every channel reflects the same narrative.
Narrow Metrics -> Cross-Channel Metrics
Measuring each channel in isolation (clicks here, impressions there) ignores the compounded impact of integration.
Instead, track cross-channel metrics in a unified dashboard. Focus on outcomes like conversions, brand lift, or customer lifetime value, not just single-channel KPIs.
Poor Coordination -> Cross-Functional Processes
When agencies, internal teams, and stakeholders work separately, campaigns can stall or fragment.
Instead, build cross-functional processes that foster collaboration, including regular check-ins, shared dashboards, and clear ownership of tasks.
By anticipating these pitfalls and adopting best practices, organizations can avoid wasted effort and unlock the full potential of the PESO model.
Turning Strategy Into Action
The PESO model isn’t just a theory: it’s a practical roadmap for creating campaigns that resonate across today’s fragmented media landscape.Â
It works best when Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned channels are intentionally orchestrated, not run in isolation.
A simple way to get started is with a pilot campaign. Choose one strong owned asset (a blog, a report, or a webinar) and map its progression through the PESO cycle: share it socially, pitch it for coverage, and amplify it with targeted ads. Monitor the results, then refine and repeat.
By taking this structured approach, brands can transform scattered efforts into a cohesive system where every channel amplifies the others.
7 Reasons Your Awareness Campaigns Aren’t Driving Revenue
Seven Reasons Your Awareness Campaigns Aren’t Driving Revenue
As marketers, our number one priority is new customer acquisition. This only happens if you plant the seed for acquisition via awareness — that top-of-funnel that marketers love and hate.
If you’re reading this, there’s a strong chance you’re undervaluing your awareness campaigns right now.
But what does “undervalued” mean? I’m saying that you aren’t attributing full revenue credit to those campaigns.
Here’s some common reasons that might be happening.
Don’t blame me if this hurts.
1. Lower-Funnel Bias
Let’s face it — we all have KPIs we're supposed to hit, and whether I'm answering to myself, the CEO, or clients, I need to prove ROI from my marketing spend.
Marketing is always the first department that gets cut. That's never the right choice — we all know that — but we’re under pressure to show provable revenue growth, at risk of being defunded or even fired. This creates bias in our reporting.
That pressure leads us to highlight the things we know are driving revenue growth. And that's always bottom-of-funnel campaigns that we have clear last-click attribution on.
These ads are the closest, most-provable, most-easily-understood answer for the eternal question: “Which ads are driving revenue?”
To the untrained eye using a clicks-only model, it looks like my lower-funnel campaigns are the only ones that are working. But I know that's not true; these campaigns only work because I spent 60% of my budget on awareness campaigns actually filling the funnel.
But until Clicks + Deterministic Views, I never had a clear picture of how well my upper-funnel campaigns are driving revenue.
Your stakeholders, however, look at that 60% of your budget that has no attribution and want explanations as to why it “isn’t driving revenue.”
Here’s what happens:
- You start cutting budget from top-of-funnel because you don't have data on how well it's working.
- You start putting that budget towards bottom-funnel because on paper, bottom-funnel looks like the only thing that's working.
But this is a self-destructive prophecy. The only reason bottom-of-funnel is working is because you were putting money into top-of-funnel — building that awareness and interest that actually resulted in capturing conversions later.
Put simply: your awareness campaigns aren't driving revenue because you’re not measuring them on revenue.
2. You Can’t Out-Tactic Human Psychology
Very few of us sell things that can be purchased instantaneously from the moment someone sees a picture of it.
So why do we keep pretending like we can?
I see this all the time. Driven by hubris, operators assume their products can be sold via Meta ads on a one-day, clicks-only basis. That privilege is limited basically to cheap, easy-to-understand, or delicious things.
If you’re measuring all your ads on a one-day clicks-only basis, you’re essentially saying your product is an impulse decision only. You’re saying the only ads you want to run are the digital equivalent of candy in the checkout line at the supermarket.
I’m sure you value your product higher than candy in the checkout line; very few of us sell things that someone sees and immediately says, "I want that right now."
So why is one-day-clicks-only the most common attribution model we use to measure our marketing performance?
In reality, sometimes you have to talk to people a lot about things before they understand, some of us are selling products that are complicated, expensive, or genuinely disruptive. We have to tell people many times and explain over a long period why they should buy it.
So why am I measuring my awareness campaigns, consideration campaigns, and conversion campaigns on a model that's only useful for measuring candy in the checkout line? It doesn't make sense.
If I sell a product that people have to think about before they buy, I have to build a campaign and marketing structure that does the work of building education, trust, interest, and consideration.
You can't out-tactic basic human psychology unless you sell candy. It's time we stop pretending otherwise and start measuring our marketing campaigns like real marketers.
3. Engagement Does Not Equal Sales
We all know this one: likes don't necessarily translate into sales.
For lack of a better way of tracking upper-funnel or organic impact, I often find myself relying on vanity metrics like engagement, view-through rates, or sometimes even likes to understand if a campaign is driving those top-of-funnel awareness measurements I'm looking for.
The problem? People who engage are not necessarily the same as people who buy.
Actually, I'd go further and say most people who engage are never going to buy. And a lot of people who do buy don't even remember what they actually saw that inspired them to buy.
That's kind of the dirty secret of post-purchase surveys, right? They remember the loudest thing or the most recent thing that brought them to purchase instead of the full actual journey that got them there.
So using engagement metrics isn't the best way for tracking that silent majority of viewers who end up going on to buy.
It's important that you have a clear model for attaching a view to the later revenue it generated. Because if you’re building an entire creative experimentation structure off of vanity metrics like engagements or views, you’re going to build creative for vanity metrics and engagements instead of building creative that drives revenue later.
It's really important that you’re following the right signal when building awareness creative.
4. Relying on Platform Data
If you're relying exclusively on platform data — Meta, TikTok, Snap, looking only at their ads managers interfaces — you're only getting half the story on the performance of your ad campaigns.
Unless your entire digital funnel, including your awareness, mid-funnel, conversion, and actual conversion events, happens inside that one platform, you're missing critical context.
Think about it this way: let's say you're running a bunch of Pinterest campaigns. They're getting a lot of engagement, a lot of interest, even driving click-throughs, but they're not driving a lot of attributable sales. Those might look like campaigns that aren't doing well if you're only looking at platform data in Pinterest.
However, if you run a quick correlation analysis, you might see that actually, your Google and Facebook performance improved in the periods after you ran those Pinterest campaigns.
Now you know those two things are happening separately, in a vacuum, but you can't actually connect them together without some sort of first-party data, like what you'd get from Northbeam.
Without that kind of data, you might undervalue those Pinterest campaigns and how well they're driving awareness. You'd cut budget from them and then watch your Meta campaigns suffer later down the road; that's exactly the kind of thing we’re trying to avoid.
You need a scientific, full-strategy view of how all your channels interact with each other. Because especially for awareness campaigns, oftentimes awareness happens on one channel like YouTube, but purchase happens somewhere else like Google or Meta.
5. You Need More Than Just MMM and Incrementality
Some people only measure the success of their awareness campaigns based on media mix modeling results or incrementality testing.
But that's only two-thirds of the story.
You need those models to help you understand what channels are actually driving revenue, what spend is important, which campaigns or channels you're testing are actually driving incremental new customer awareness and generation.
But you really need to have MMM, incrementality, and MTA for every stage of your funnel if you want maximum visibility into how well your awareness is working.
Specifically for awareness campaigns, without a model like C+DV for measuring the performance of actual creatives, you don't have that insight. You need creative-level insight into which awareness campaigns are actually driving revenue for your business.
Otherwise, you'll spend forever doing campaign testing, running incrementality tests, and rerunning your MMM models when really what you need is to optimize your awareness campaigns as effectively as your mid-funnel or conversion campaigns.
That's why we built C_D+V: to help you understand which specific assets are responsible for generating your revenue at the top of funnel.
6. Creative Is Targeting, Now
Most of us still misunderstand the massive shift that happened since the launch of the algorithmic-first approach to social media — something that really started in earnest right after COVID.
TikTok pioneered this, but what they did was fundamentally change how social media works: from a friends-first feed into an algorithmic-first feed.
That means the way you get in front of people is not via targeting selections within the platforms themselves. The way you get in front of people — and the way you psychologically teach them about your product — is by making creative that gets their attention.
Instead of thinking of the internet, especially an algorithmic feed like TikTok, as a collection of demographics (young people, old people, Gen Z, Millennials, people who like cats, people who like dogs), you should think of it as communities of people who consume similar content.
Content that looks similar to each other. Content that follows a specific visual energy, style, or pacing.
That's the new way you communicate with people.
The only way you can really value creative as a discovery, top-of-funnel tool is by understanding which ads are driving the sales.
This sort of strategy requires you to think: How do I make content that travels through the algorithm and gets in front of the people I know will like my product and my message?
7. Brand Versus Strategy
Awareness isn’t about beating people over the head with your brand identity anymore. It's about speaking to them where they're at; the algorithm changed this.
Every subset of your audience is going to think differently about your product. You need to meet them where they are, and if you have no real data outside of engagement metrics, you don't know how these ads are actually being received.
So often we prioritize brand identity in our marketing when we should be prioritizing our strategic vision. I talked earlier about how you really get in front of people through creative testing and different types of creative; that means you need to change the way you're approaching your brand standards and brand identity in your ads.
Think about it: if you sell protein powder, there are going to be bodybuilders.
There are going to be ballerinas.
People who just need a little bit more protein in their life.
People trying to recover from eating disorders.
Athletes.
Grandmas and grandpas.
Dads.
All sorts of people who need protein powder.
Why do you think one message would work for all of these people when we live in such a fragmented, decentralized, algorithm-driven internet?
You need to say, "Okay, I'm going to adjust my brand to fit the styles of communication that all these different demographics actually use and respond to."
Instead of saying, "No, we only use this color," or "We only use this type of model," or "Our visuals have to be up to this certain standard," ask yourself:
For each subset of people on the internet that I want to communicate with, what sort of content works best for getting that person's attention?
It does not cheapen your brand to change the way your brand appears on the internet.
The most important thing is that the people online who are watching your ads feel like the product is for them.
How do you achieve that? By meeting them where they're at.
If you've ever rejected an ad because you felt it wasn't up to your brand standards, you're already damaging your awareness performance.
Instead of thinking about your ads from a brand perspective — "Does this creative fit my brand guidelines? Does it fit my style?" — ask yourself: Does this ad creative reach out to and have an impact on the people I want it to reach?
And the only way you can measure that is by using models that attach that performance back to revenue generated.
Try out Clicks + Deterministic Views now and start getting that awareness revenue you deserve.
First vs Second vs Third-Party Data: What Are They and Why They Matter
As third-party signals fade and privacy controls rise, the question for brands isn’t if they should pivot their data strategy, it’s how.
The data landscape has changed dramatically: cookies are crumbling, walled gardens are tightening, and consumers expect greater transparency around how their information is used.
Marketers now face a complex puzzle. Different data sources come with different consent models, levels of quality, and degrees of scale.
Get the mix wrong, and you risk wasted budget, ineffective targeting, or worse: eroding the trust you’ve worked hard to build with customers.
This guide is designed to cut through the noise.
We’ll define the three core types of customer data (first-, second-, and third-party), show where each shines, and explain how to combine them responsibly.
You’ll also find practical frameworks for migrating toward first-party strength, plus governance and measurement checklists to ensure your strategy is both effective and compliant.
What Each Data Type Is (and Where It Comes From)
When marketers talk about customer data, the conversation usually centers on three categories: first-party, second-party, and third-party.
Each type differs in how it’s collected, how much control you have over it, and what it’s best used for.
First-party data
This is the gold standard. First-party data is information you collect directly from your customers through your own channels and systems.
Examples of customer data types include:
- On-site behavior such as page views, clicks, or cart activity
- Transaction history and purchase frequency
- Customer service interactions (emails, chats, calls)
- Data from preference centers, surveys, or loyalty programs
Because it’s gathered with direct consent, you control the context, accuracy, and recency. First-party data forms the foundation for personalization, retention, and long-term trust.
Second-party data
Second-party data is essentially someone else’s first-party data that you access through a trusted partnership. Think of it as data sharing with permission.
Examples of customer data types include:
- A retail brand sharing loyalty data with a complementary CPG partner
- A travel site exchanging booking information with an airline
- Co-marketing campaigns where audiences are segmented and matched
This type of data is highly relevant and often more accurate than third-party sources, but it requires clear contracts, governance, and strong alignment between partners.
Third-party data
Third-party data comes from external aggregators who collect information from a wide range of sources: websites, apps, surveys, public records, and more. Marketers often use it for scale and reach.
Examples of customer data types include:
- Audience segments for advertising platforms
- Demographic or interest-based enrichment
- Market intelligence panels and benchmarks
The tradeoff: third party data quality and accuracy can vary, availability is shrinking due to privacy regulations, and reliance on third party data can create compliance risks.
While third-party data can still play a role in broad awareness or filling specific gaps, its dominance is quickly fading.
First vs Second vs Third-Party Data: Advantages, Risks, and Best-Fit Scenarios
Each type of customer data comes with clear strengths, inherent risks, and specific situations where it performs best.
Knowing where each one shines (and where it doesn’t) helps marketers design smarter, more compliant strategies.
First-party data
Strengths:
- First-party data is the most accurate and up-to-date, since it’s drawn directly from your customer interactions.
- It’s collected with explicit consent, aligning closely with compliance requirements like GDPR and CCPA.
- Because you own the relationship, it allows for closed-loop measurement, tying marketing actions directly to business outcomes.
Risks/limits:
- The main limitation is scale. Your audience size defines the boundaries of your first-party data.
- To grow its usefulness, you need seamless capture experiences (clear opt-ins, loyalty programs, preference centers) and compelling value exchanges so customers willingly share information.
Best fit:
- First-party data is best for personalization, lifecycle retention strategies, seed audiences for modeling, and as the ground truth in clean-room collaborations.
Second-party data
Strengths:
- Second-party data combines the accuracy of first-party data with the reach of partnerships.
- Because it’s exchanged directly between companies, it often carries high relevance: your partner’s customers are likely to resemble your ideal prospects.
- It also opens up category-level insights you might not capture on your own.
Risks/limits:
- These relationships come with contractual and technical overhead.
- You’ll need strong governance, alignment on use cases, and infrastructure like data clean rooms or secure exchanges.
- Misalignment between partners can limit value or create compliance headaches.
Best fit:
- Second-party data works best for co-marketing efforts, finding lookalike audiences through adjacent partners, and adding enrichment for specific channels (e.g., expanding an email list with partner insights).
Third-party data
Strengths:
- Third-party data’s value lies in speed and scale.
- Aggregators offer broad audience reach across demographics, geographies, and interests.
- It can also deliver upper-funnel visibility and market intelligence that would otherwise be hard to access.
Risks/limits:
- Accuracy and freshness vary widely, since the data often comes from disparate sources.
- Growing regulation and browser privacy changes are reducing availability and increasing compliance risks.
- It’s also difficult to port third-party data consistently across channels.
Best fit:
- Third-party data is most effective for broad awareness campaigns, filling gaps where first- or second-party data isn’t available, and providing high-level market sizing or competitive context.
Use Cases & Examples
Marketers rarely rely on just one type of data. In practice, the strongest strategies blend first-, second-, and third-party data depending on the goal.
Here’s how each comes into play across common scenarios:
Acquisition
- First-party: Start with the customers you know best. Using your own purchase history or high-intent site activity as a seed audience allows for more accurate modeled expansions.
- Second-party: Partner data can help you discover adjacent audiences. For example, a fitness apparel brand might leverage a nutrition company’s loyalty data to find new customers with aligned interests.
- Third-party: Broader segments from data providers still have a role in testing new markets or scaling awareness quickly, though quality checks and validation are essential.
Personalization
- First-party: Behavioral signals (browsing patterns, past purchases) combined with declared preferences (survey responses, opt-ins) are the foundation of personalization engines.
- Second-party: Enriching with partner insights (say, a travel site layering hotel preferences from an airline partner) sharpens relevance and reduces wasted impressions.
- Third-party: While less common in personalization, third-party attributes can provide context, such as layering demographic markers or lifestyle segments onto first-party records.
Attribution & Measurement
- First-party: Your own data is the source of truth for connecting campaigns to business outcomes.
- Second-party: Partner data helps measure shared efforts, like determining the performance of a co-branded promotion across channels.
- Third-party: Independent panels or benchmark datasets can add external context, helping validate your performance against industry norms.
Data Collaboration
- First-party: Secure data clean rooms let you match your own data with a partner’s in a privacy-safe way, without directly sharing raw records.
- Second-party: Selective exchanges with trusted partners expand reach while maintaining governance controls.
- Third-party: Some walled gardens allow limited third-party enrichment inside their platforms, useful for audience validation or contextual layering.
Strategy & Decision Framework
A smart data strategy isn’t about choosing one type of data over another, it’s about sequencing and combining them in a way that balances precision, scale, and compliance.
Here’s a framework to guide decision-making:
Start with First-Party Strength
Your foundation should always be first-party data.
Audit the identifiers you already capture (emails, device IDs, loyalty program logins), review your consent records, and map every capture point across web, app, and offline channels.
Then, design high-value collection experiences. Think gated content, member benefits, or personalized offers that give customers a clear reason to share data.
Add Second-Party Selectively
Once your first-party base is strong, look for opportunities to partner.
The best partners are those with complementary audiences; not direct competitors but brands whose customers overlap with yours in meaningful ways.
Define the use case up front, outline how long the data will be shared, and agree on success metrics before you exchange a single record.
Use Third-Party Surgically
Third-party data should no longer be a default.
Instead, apply it sparingly in contexts where its utility clearly outweighs the risks. For example: testing into a new market or layering demographic context for high-level audience insights.
Always benchmark performance against your first-party data to validate incremental value.
Governance by Design
Strong governance is what keeps your strategy resilient.
Document every data source, its purpose, and its history. Establish retention rules and deletion expectations from day one.
Work closely with your legal and security teams to ensure compliance, and treat privacy not as a box to tick but as a core brand value.
Measurement & Governance
Collecting data is only valuable if it’s trustworthy, well-governed, and tied to measurable business outcomes. Marketers should track performance and enforce safeguards in parallel.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
To understand whether your data strategy is working, monitor:
- Capture rate, match rate, and consent opt-in: Are you collecting enough data, and is it permissioned?
- Profile completeness: How rich and usable are the customer records you hold? How effective are your identity resolution processes?
- Lift vs. control metrics: Track how data-driven campaigns perform compared to holdouts: conversion rate, average order value (AOV), customer acquisition cost (CAC), and retention.
- Media efficiency: Does better data reduce wasted spend and improve return on ad spend?
- Data quality: Keep an eye on freshness, duplication, and conflict rate so your systems aren’t operating on outdated or contradictory records.
Controls and Governance Practices
Measurement means little without compliance and governance baked in:
- Consent logs and purpose binding: Maintain clear records of when and how data was collected, and ensure usage aligns with stated purposes.
- Subject rights workflows: Make it easy to fulfill access, correction, or deletion requests.
- Data minimization and retention policies: Collect only what you need, store it for a defined period, and delete on schedule.
- Clean-room policies and partner due diligence: Establish clear rules for collaboration, vet partners carefully, and confirm that privacy-enhancing technologies are in place.
- Model validation cadence: Regularly test and recalibrate models that rely on your data, ensuring accuracy and fairness over time.
Strong measurement paired with robust governance ensures that your data mix not only performs but also stays compliant and resilient as privacy standards evolve.
Tools & Workflow
Turning raw data into business value requires the right infrastructure. A modern marketing stack should cover collection, collaboration, activation, and analytics, with privacy built in at every step.
Foundation
Start with systems that centralize and standardize your own data:
- Customer Data Platform (CDP) or CRM to unify records across touchpoints.
- Tag management and server-side collection to ensure accurate event tracking while reducing reliance on cookies and client-side scripts.
Collaboration
To safely expand beyond your walls, invest in technologies that support secure data sharing:
- Data clean rooms that allow you to match and analyze datasets without exposing personally identifiable information.
- Secure partner exchanges for controlled second-party data sharing.
- Privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) like encryption and anonymization to minimize risk in collaborative environments.
Activation
Once data is unified and governed, it can power real-time engagement:
- Journey orchestration tools that personalize cross-channel experiences.
- DSP and paid media integrations for efficient audience targeting.
- Web and app personalization engines to deliver tailored content, offers, or product recommendations.
Analytics
Finally, analytics tools close the loop and measure impact:
- Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) or Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA) where feasible to understand cross-channel performance.
- Incrementality testing to validate lift and avoid over-attributing success.
- Audience health scoring to monitor the quality and long-term viability of your datasets.
Implementation Plan
Shifting to a privacy-first, data-driven strategy doesn’t happen overnight.
If you’re wondering how to shift from third-party to first-party data, the most effective approach is phased: start with a baseline, build securely, test deliberately, and scale what works.
Phase 1: Audit
Begin by mapping what you already have. Identify all current data sources, the consent mechanisms tied to them, and any system dependencies.
Look for quick wins, such as fixing broken tags or improving opt-in language, to boost capture rates right away.
Phase 2: Build
Strengthen your first-party foundation.
Standardize event tracking, establish persistent identifiers, and ensure consent records are accurate and accessible.
At the same time, prepare for collaboration and responsible data activation by setting up clean room access and defining clear partner selection criteria.
Phase 3: Pilot
Run controlled tests with limited scope.
This might include a single second-party partnership to expand reach or a carefully chosen third-party dataset for enrichment.
Always benchmark these efforts against first-party-only cohorts to measure true incremental value.
Phase 4: Scale & Govern
Once you’ve proven impact, expand.
Broaden successful partnerships, refine enrichment, and embed learnings into standard workflows.
At this stage, governance becomes critical: formalize contracts, define retention and deletion rules, and set a cadence for ongoing validation to ensure compliance and data quality over time.
A phased roadmap not only reduces risk but also creates momentum, giving your team early wins while building toward long-term resilience.
Future-Proof Your Data Strategy
In a world where privacy is tightening and third-party signals are fading, not all data is created equal.
The path forward is clear:
- Lead with first-party data. It offers accuracy, trust, and long-term resilience.
- Use second-party data strategically to expand relevance through permissioned, high-value partnerships.
- Apply third-party data sparingly, focusing only on contexts where it truly adds incremental reach or market insight.
- Measure incrementality and enforce governance so that your data mix remains effective, compliant, and future-proof.
Marketers who embrace this balanced approach will do more than survive the loss of third-party cookies: they’ll build durable customer relationships, smarter activation strategies, and a stronger foundation for growth.
Product
RESOURCES
Support
Legal
Follow us
.svg)
